Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Current »

Congressional Plan as proposed by Kevin Prager

---------------- Begin Forwarded Message ----------------
Subject: Two plans for representation
Date Sent: Tuesday, 13 July 2010 17:19
From: Prager Kevin <prager.kevin@hq.nato.int>

I have been advocating this plan for several years. It is a simple, software-driven (i.e. Excel) solution which would mimic the US Congress'
bi-cameral system – a solution that would instantly and separately calculate both equal (fair) votes and fully proportional votes from all
CCs – in which a "win" would require 50+% in both Fair and Proportional vote tallies.

Who would get what out of such a plan?

  • Big countries would get a major step towards proportionality, and be assured that even a large coalition of tiny countries could never
    force through decisions without big-country buy-in
  • Small countries would be offered protection against pure proportionality – more than half of DPCA members would need to be
    convinced to pass something, which seems a reasonable minimum to me.
  • The DNC would get an unassailably fair AND proportional system. Who could possibly argue with the system set up by the founding fathers?
  • The system is future-proofed. It would grow with the organization.

It still seems to me like an idea that could be successfully sold to both the DNC and the DPCA membership (since at least 2 moderates from
Canada and Norway independently proposed similar Congressional-style plans).

----------------- End Forwarded Message ---------------

  • No labels